I wish the companies that make the audio versions of books did a better job casting the narrators. If the book is good enough it is easier to accept a mediocre narrator. I wouldn't look for a book that Hannah Friedman narrated like I do with other narrators that I really like but I wouldn't not listen to a book just because Hannah Friedman is the narrator. I saw potential in the story and would try another book from Amanda Hocking. I think it should be told from Peter's point of view, to be more original. but I would hope that the screenplay helps the story rather than hurts it (as was Twilight, which was carried on the backs of its actors - I still loved it). If this book were a movie would you go see it? I am not a fan of Hannah Friedman's reads - her emotive approach often differs from that of the characters she is reading about. What didn’t you like about Hannah Friedman’s performance?

Hocking's writing is anemic (interms of descriptions of places, rooms, etc.), because of the limited and sometimes painfully repetitive vocabulary of her teen protaganist, Alice. I think Peter's character offers the most inspiration for future works in the series. I like that Jack's character chose to fight for Alice in the end - I look forward to the outcome of his and Peter's (his brother for whom Alice is meant 'by blood') conflict. What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting? Would you try another book from Amanda Hocking and/or Hannah Friedman?

Fate amanda hocking